<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trend Watch: Animated GIFs in Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/trend-watch-animated-gifs-in-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/trend-watch-animated-gifs-in-email/</link>
	<description>MailChimp, email marketing, and monkeys!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:25:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mahalie</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/trend-watch-animated-gifs-in-email/comment-page-1/#comment-2569</link>
		<dc:creator>mahalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/?p=2005#comment-2569</guid>
		<description>CreativeTechs (http://creativetechs.com/tipsblog/), who recently switched to MailChimp I think, uses this technique to great effect - not annoying at all...they use it to illustrate screen shots and tutorial examples. 

I used to love it, I say used to because my firm &quot;upgraded&quot; to Outlook 2007. Oh well, at least I have the worst case scenario to test for!

The first folks I saw using this effectively was http://photojojo.com/content/ - they have excellent style!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CreativeTechs (<a href="http://creativetechs.com/tipsblog/)" rel="nofollow">http://creativetechs.com/tipsblog/)</a>, who recently switched to MailChimp I think, uses this technique to great effect &#8211; not annoying at all&#8230;they use it to illustrate screen shots and tutorial examples. </p>
<p>I used to love it, I say used to because my firm &#8220;upgraded&#8221; to Outlook 2007. Oh well, at least I have the worst case scenario to test for!</p>
<p>The first folks I saw using this effectively was <a href="http://photojojo.com/content/" rel="nofollow">http://photojojo.com/content/</a> &#8211; they have excellent style!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
