<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MailChimp Email Marketing Blog &#187; spam traps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/tag/spam-traps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog</link>
	<description>MailChimp, email marketing, and monkeys!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:20:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Deadly Email Marketing Mistake</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/deadly-email-marketing-mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/deadly-email-marketing-mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emarketing, Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MailChimp News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips, Tricks, Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deadly email marketing mistake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email marketing mistake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam traps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/deadly-email-marketing-mistake/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s my latest article for Practical Ecommerce.
Goes over one of the deadliest email marketing mistakes we see new email marketers make:
Sending to old email lists.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my latest article for Practical Ecommerce.</p>
<p>Goes over one of the deadliest email marketing mistakes we see new email marketers make:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/713/Email-Marketing-Avoid-This-Deadly-Mistake/ " target="_blank">Sending to old email lists.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/deadly-email-marketing-mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hard Bounces Reveal Signs of Trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/hard-bounces-reveal-signs-of-trouble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/hard-bounces-reveal-signs-of-trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deliverability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips, Tricks, Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard bounce averages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard bounces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft bounces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam traps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/hard-bounces-reveal-signs-of-trouble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just sent a campaign for MailChimp yesterday, and checked my stats. Here&#8217;s my personal stat-checking routine:

Check for abuse complaints. My list is double opt-in, and I never import anybody, so complaints should be virtually zero. I got no complaints. Hooray!
Check the feel-good stuff, like open rates and click rates. I rarely send emails to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just sent a campaign for MailChimp yesterday, and checked my stats. Here&#8217;s my personal stat-checking routine:</p>
<ol>
<li>Check for abuse complaints. My list is double opt-in, and I never import anybody, so complaints should be virtually zero. I got no complaints. Hooray!</li>
<li>Check the feel-good stuff, like open rates and click rates. I rarely send emails to this list (don&#8217;t want to bug them) so I typically get between a 40%-50% open rate. Yep,  41% so far.</li>
<li>Look at what URLs people clicked on. I like to see what my audience is most interested in. It&#8217;s usually techie/how-to stuff.</li>
<li><strong>Check bounces. </strong></li>
</ol>
<p>Bounces are where a lot of people get confused, because there are different types of bounces, and different ways you should treat them. But they also reveal a lot about your list, and can be like that canary in the coal mine, telling you &#8220;something&#8217;s wrong and you better act soon.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-737"></span></p>
<p><strong>Soft bounces</strong> are when an email address is temporarily unavailable. Maybe the recipient&#8217;s server was down, or just too busy. You generally don&#8217;t have to do anything&#8212;MailChimp retries delivering a reasonable, non-server-annoying amount of times, and if it still gets rejected, we keep that email address on your list for the next campaign. It&#8217;s only if an email address soft bounces 5 campaigns in a row that we clean it off your list for good.</p>
<p><strong>Hard bounces</strong> mean an email address was non-deliverable. It&#8217;s gone. Deleted. Doesn&#8217;t exist anymore, never existed in the first place, whatever. Lost cause. These get removed from your list by MailChimp immediately. That&#8217;s because if you try resending to these emails, you could get blocked by that server (they track who keeps sending emails to bad addresses).</p>
<p>In general, hard bounces are more important to look at than soft.</p>
<p>So when I check my stats, I go to the hard bounces and I look for <strong>trends</strong>:</p>
<ol>
<li>Did I get an abnormally high number of hard bounces? Half of one percent of my list hard bounced, which isn&#8217;t too shabby (here are <a href="http://www.mailchimp.com/resources/email_marketing_benchmarks.phtml" title="Email Marketing Benchmarks">average email bounce rates by industry</a>).</li>
<li>Visually scan the domains in my hard bounces. Are there lots of hard bounces from the <em><strong>same domain?</strong></em> This tells me if any particular ISPs or company email servers are blocking me (which in turn would lead me to contact their postmaster to politely request unblocking).</li>
</ol>
<p>For example, my hard bounce list looks extremely random. Every email that bounced was from a different domain, and none of those domains were from a major ISP (like hotmail, aol, yahoo, gmail, etc).</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you see a block of hard bounces from the very same domain, this would indicate there&#8217;s a problem to look into. Let&#8217;s say you got 10 bounces, all from comcast.com addresses (<a href="http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/comcast-feedback-loop-reports/" title="Comcast feedback loop">this happened to lots of people back in December 2007</a>). First, we recommend you take a look at your content, to determine whether or not it had <a href="http://www.mailchimp.com/resources/how_spam_filters_think.phtml" title="How spam filters think">things that trigger spam filters</a>.  Don&#8217;t just arrogantly assume, &#8220;I&#8217;m not a spammer, and this isn&#8217;t spam, so it can&#8217;t be my problem.&#8221; Most of the time, it&#8217;s your content, not your email delivery provider. Or, it&#8217;s your list (sending to a really old list can result in blocking, especially if you&#8217;ve got a <a href="http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/keeping-spam-trap-addresses-off-your-list/" title="Keeping spamtraps off your list">spam trap</a> on the list).</p>
<p>But if you see that your content is just fine, or if it&#8217;s a really overwhelming number of hard bounces from one domain (and no other emails to that domain got through) then we definitely have a problem, and it&#8217;s time to call your email delivery service.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t just focus on your open rates. Hard bounces are your early indicator of deliverability problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/hard-bounces-reveal-signs-of-trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
