<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Postini Bug Results in False Spam Reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/</link>
	<description>MailChimp, email marketing, and monkeys!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:25:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Most Common Spam Filter Triggers &#124; MailChimp Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-2784</link>
		<dc:creator>Most Common Spam Filter Triggers &#124; MailChimp Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/#comment-2784</guid>
		<description>[...] in the near future). We picked those, because they&#8217;re the most commonly used&#8212;and vexing&#8212;spam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the near future). We picked those, because they&#8217;re the most commonly used&#8212;and vexing&#8212;spam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/#comment-576</guid>
		<description>@Dennis - Yep, crappy Microsoft-generated code (or crappy code in general) can hurt your spam score. Re: Postini, our issue was specifically something in the header portion, which wouldn&#039;t be something a user could modify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dennis &#8211; Yep, crappy Microsoft-generated code (or crappy code in general) can hurt your spam score. Re: Postini, our issue was specifically something in the header portion, which wouldn&#8217;t be something a user could modify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Dayman</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Dayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/#comment-575</guid>
		<description>I was told that if you take a document originally typed on an application such as MS Word and then copy and paste this into the marketing e-mail it gives it funky html code that for some reason gives your e-mail a lower score in Postini.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was told that if you take a document originally typed on an application such as MS Word and then copy and paste this into the marketing e-mail it gives it funky html code that for some reason gives your e-mail a lower score in Postini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jacoby</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jacoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 18:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Issues between filtering systems seem to ALWAYS turn into &quot;It&#039;s not US&quot; arguments, until you do some hardcore debugging and prove to the vendors that it IS them.  Seldom does the vendor support structure step up to help diagnose or troubleshoot....

I spent 3 months chasing problems between Barracuda and MIMESweeper systems.  Another month chasing problems between Barracuda and TrendMicro systems.  Thank goodness I have established good relationships with the Barracuda support folks and they were willing to work through the issue, getting us past the &#039;blame game&#039; and into detailed diagnostics to help the OTHER vendor fix their issue...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Issues between filtering systems seem to ALWAYS turn into &#8220;It&#8217;s not US&#8221; arguments, until you do some hardcore debugging and prove to the vendors that it IS them.  Seldom does the vendor support structure step up to help diagnose or troubleshoot&#8230;.</p>
<p>I spent 3 months chasing problems between Barracuda and MIMESweeper systems.  Another month chasing problems between Barracuda and TrendMicro systems.  Thank goodness I have established good relationships with the Barracuda support folks and they were willing to work through the issue, getting us past the &#8216;blame game&#8217; and into detailed diagnostics to help the OTHER vendor fix their issue&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Great find. Although some may find it a catch-all for any issues with postini, I  have been battling with some illogical postini blocks on inbound tests, too. Thanks for the thorough follow-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great find. Although some may find it a catch-all for any issues with postini, I  have been battling with some illogical postini blocks on inbound tests, too. Thanks for the thorough follow-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for actively pursuing beyond the initial rebuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for actively pursuing beyond the initial rebuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word to the Wise &#187; Postini bug</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Word to the Wise &#187; Postini bug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/postini-bug-results-in-false-spam-reports/#comment-540</guid>
		<description>[...] 09 May 2008 at 07:53 am &#124; Tagged as: Blocking, Blocklisting, Industry  Ben over at MailChimp has an article talking about a recent experience with Postini and an actual bug that causes Postini to interact [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 09 May 2008 at 07:53 am | Tagged as: Blocking, Blocklisting, Industry  Ben over at MailChimp has an article talking about a recent experience with Postini and an actual bug that causes Postini to interact [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
