<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One-Click Accidental Unsubscribes Fix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/one-click-accidental-unsubscribes-fix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/one-click-accidental-unsubscribes-fix/</link>
	<description>MailChimp, email marketing, and monkeys!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:25:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/one-click-accidental-unsubscribes-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-4822</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/one-click-accidental-unsubscribes-fix/#comment-4822</guid>
		<description>It has indeed been a while since we&#039;ve posted, so maybe spam filters have changed by now. But we haven&#039;t seen a big uptick in complaints about &quot;unwanted unsubs&quot; so my guess is they haven&#039;t changed (or maybe they did, but did it in a smart way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has indeed been a while since we&#8217;ve posted, so maybe spam filters have changed by now. But we haven&#8217;t seen a big uptick in complaints about &#8220;unwanted unsubs&#8221; so my guess is they haven&#8217;t changed (or maybe they did, but did it in a smart way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/one-click-accidental-unsubscribes-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-4821</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/one-click-accidental-unsubscribes-fix/#comment-4821</guid>
		<description>I realize this is a very late reply, but I&#039;ve just been browsing your archives for quite some time and wanted to respond. 

Why wouldn&#039;t spam filters follow javascript redirects? Wouldn&#039;t it make sense for them to follow it? Spammers could use the same technique as you do and have a safe non spammy first page which is then redirected via js to the real spam. If spam filters don&#039;t yet do this, they probably will in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize this is a very late reply, but I&#8217;ve just been browsing your archives for quite some time and wanted to respond. </p>
<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t spam filters follow javascript redirects? Wouldn&#8217;t it make sense for them to follow it? Spammers could use the same technique as you do and have a safe non spammy first page which is then redirected via js to the real spam. If spam filters don&#8217;t yet do this, they probably will in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
