<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MailChimp Subscriber Chiclet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/mailchimp-subscriber-chiclet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/mailchimp-subscriber-chiclet/</link>
	<description>MailChimp, email marketing, and monkeys!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:25:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/mailchimp-subscriber-chiclet/comment-page-1/#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/?p=1213#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>This is nice, but could you add a feature where you can enter a multiplier that the actual numbers will be multiplied by? A small, randomly changing prime number should be subtracted from the total to avoid numbers that look suspicious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nice, but could you add a feature where you can enter a multiplier that the actual numbers will be multiplied by? A small, randomly changing prime number should be subtracted from the total to avoid numbers that look suspicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex W.</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/mailchimp-subscriber-chiclet/comment-page-1/#comment-1815</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/?p=1213#comment-1815</guid>
		<description>I like the Chiclets, but I wish there was one without the MailChimp branding.  Don&#039;t get me wrong -- you guys deserve all the credit you can get -- but I&#039;d like my users to just see me as the owner, manager and yes, even, the &quot;power&quot; behind the mailing list they are thinking of joining as opposed to a third party.

It&#039;s for much of the same reasons that I like that MailChimp chooses NOT to include their branding in the emails it sends out on my behalf.  For better or for worse, when it comes to my interactions with my potential customers, I just want it to be about us.

Just my 2 cents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Chiclets, but I wish there was one without the MailChimp branding.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8212; you guys deserve all the credit you can get &#8212; but I&#8217;d like my users to just see me as the owner, manager and yes, even, the &#8220;power&#8221; behind the mailing list they are thinking of joining as opposed to a third party.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s for much of the same reasons that I like that MailChimp chooses NOT to include their branding in the emails it sends out on my behalf.  For better or for worse, when it comes to my interactions with my potential customers, I just want it to be about us.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/mailchimp-subscriber-chiclet/comment-page-1/#comment-1800</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/?p=1213#comment-1800</guid>
		<description>@Jonathan -  The assumption here is that, so long as sound list management practices are in place (cleaning unsubs, spam complaints, bounces, etc), and so long as a sender only practices permission-based email marketing, then having a large list is a direct result of having a good customer relationship and experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathan &#8211;  The assumption here is that, so long as sound list management practices are in place (cleaning unsubs, spam complaints, bounces, etc), and so long as a sender only practices permission-based email marketing, then having a large list is a direct result of having a good customer relationship and experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/mailchimp-subscriber-chiclet/comment-page-1/#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mailchimp.com/blog/?p=1213#comment-1798</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I&#039;m not sure if I like this one. It puts too much focus on the size of the list. I&#039;ve see time and time again that when this size is the focus, the quality suffers. We need to focus on the customer relationship and experience. If that is sound, the subscribers will come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I&#8217;m not sure if I like this one. It puts too much focus on the size of the list. I&#8217;ve see time and time again that when this size is the focus, the quality suffers. We need to focus on the customer relationship and experience. If that is sound, the subscribers will come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
