That title up there is a quote from an article by Michael Arrington from TechCrunch: I pissed off a spammer today. (h/t to @wise_laura for the link)
This isn’t the first we’ve seen of PR email spam…
Email Marketing, Business & Monkeys
That title up there is a quote from an article by Michael Arrington from TechCrunch: I pissed off a spammer today. (h/t to @wise_laura for the link)
This isn’t the first we’ve seen of PR email spam…
So you’re the IT guy at some company, and the marketing team is bugging you to put together “an email blaster thingy” so they can send email marketing campaigns. First of all, if they actually used the word “blast” you need to immediately revoke all their internet access, and go ahead and punch them in the gut. As head of IT, you’re pretty much obligated to do that. Or, if you’re a more peaceful kinda nerd, you can simply print out this guide, and drop it on their desk: [Spam lawsuits: what's the worst that can happen?]
Okay, back to the topic at hand. If you’re the stubborn or paranoid kind of IT person who really, really, really wants to build your own email delivery engine, and you don’t want to use a service like MailChimp, that’s cool. But setting up a mass email infrastructure (with great deliverability) is hard, and there are things you’ll need to know about selecting your MTA, pitfalls in cloud-computing IPs, selecting the right hardware, proper bounce handling, ISP rate limiting, security concerns, abuse monitoring, blacklists, reputation services, and on and on.
You’ll need to get your hands on some kind of super-secret, industry-insider, reveal-all kind of guide. Our new Deliverability Engineer, Brandon, just wrote that guide…
You may have seen the announcement over at Laura Atkins’ blog about Yahoo no longer giving preferred delivery to Goodmail certified messages. I’ve got no insight as to why this might be, and have zero opinion about Goodmail anymore.
But I did find this comment from Laura very relevant to something we’re doing at MailChimp:
“Quite frankly, I am unsurprised by this. My impression of Goodmail has always been they never really understood the role of a certifying agency. For any certifying agency to be successful, they must continually monitor certified customers and enforce standards. Goodmail’s initial certification process was fine, but they never seemed to follow through on the monitoring and enforcement.”
That part about how “they must continually monitor”? I can’t blame Goodmail. That’s extremely hard to do! In a way, MailChimp tried to do this sorta thing ourselves…
Horrible title, I know. Anyway, if you’re seeing your emails get junked more often than usual this year (perhaps in your inbox inspection reports), it’s probably because of this date issue that Laura Atkins talks about here.
I thought this was a nice SPAM related video with a happy, holiday ending.
of course, the comments on youtube are pretty mean.
Viral project with some complex results.
If you care about email deliverability, you should follow Al Iverson’s Spam Resource Blog. You’ll always find little nuggets of email wisdom over there. In this article, at the bottom, read about Hotmail’s “Silent Discarding” problem, and his recommendation for fixing it. SenderID and SPF are ways of authenticating your emails, so they don’t look so suspicious to ISPs and other receiving servers. For MailChimp customers, authentication is free and automatically activated for all your emails.
On a recent ESPC call, a major ISP (who owns one of the top 3 email services) reported that they were moving away from using feedback loops as their primary method of determining the “spaminess” of a sender. Before the FBL pundits rejoice, wait till you hear what they’re measuring instead.
Now, they’re shifting their attention to measuring “engagement.” They defined engagement as opens, clicks, and having an email moved out of the spam folder. This is similar to Gmail’s approach to leaving images on if the recipient knows the sender.
Hmm. If ISPs are starting to look at how engaged your subscribers are, how could an email sender use this to their advantage (beyond simple list segmentation)? Perhaps you could send email a little differently through your delivery servers, based on your subscribers’ engagement activity? For example, if you knew half the people on your list were active users, but the other half not so much, wouldn’t it be smart to deliver the campaign to the engaged people first, then the others last? It would really suck to only get a small portion of your list delivered before an ISP decided you have poor list management practices, and blocked the remainder of your message.
Yes, MailChimp does all that. Automatically, and behind the scenes. That’s the reason we launched the List Activity Score back in March. We rank every single user on your list by their engagement, then we prioritize email delivery through our network based on overall list activity score. One of the many ways our nerds in the lab keep striving to improve email marketing.
Learn more about our List Activity Score
Related:
How sending to old lists will kill your deliverability
We just had to help a MailChimp customer whose email campaigns got this strange warning by gmail:
To be honest, I’ve never seen that warning, and have no idea what exactly triggered it. As you can see, the email was also sent straight to gmail’s junk folder.
On the surface, nothing about the campaign looks bad. The general content of the campaign is fine. The sender is not in a risky business (it’s a church). Their email delivery infrastructure (ahem, mailchimp) is fine. So what gives?
Follow us on Twitter • Subscribe to our Newsletter • MailChimp Jungle • MailChimp Labs
Copyright © 2009 MailChimp. All rights reserved • Contact Us • Partner With Us • Abuse Desk • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use